A global analysis of habitat fragmentation research in reptiles and amphibians: what have we done so far?

A global analysis of habitat fragmentation research in reptiles and amphibians: what have we done so far?

Our new review on habitat fragmentation research in amphibians and reptiles is just published in Biodiversity and Conservation early online! My PhD student Nicholas Tan did a great job analysing the global patterns of research agendas based on more than 1400 papers, comparing methodological and taxonomic biases across geographical regions. The full text is available here:

Tan, W. C., A. Herrel, and D. Rödder. A global analysis of habitat fragmentation research in reptiles and amphibians: What have we done so far? Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02530-6

Habitat change and fragmentation are the primary causes of biodiversity loss worldwide. Recent decades have seen a surge of funding, published papers and citations in the field as these threats to biodiversity continue to rise. However, how research directions and agenda are evolving in this field remains poorly understood. In this study, we examined the current state of research on habitat fragmentation (due to agriculture, logging, fragmentation, urbanisation and roads) pertaining to two of the most threatened vertebrate groups, reptiles and amphibians. We did so by conducting a global scale review of geographical and taxonomical trends on the habitat fragmentation types, associated sampling methods and response variables. Our analyses revealed a number of biases with existing research efforts being focused on three continents (e.g., North America, Europe and Australia) and a surplus of studies measuring species richness and abundance. However, we saw a shift in research agenda towards studies utilising technological advancements including genetic and spatial data analyses. Our findings suggest important associations between sampling methods and prevalent response variables but not with the types of habitat fragmentation. These research agendas are found homogeneously distributed across all continents. Increased research investment with appropriate sampling techniques is crucial in biodiversity hotpots such as the tropics where unprecedented threats to herpetofauna exist.

Map of study locations for a amphibians and b reptiles with each circle representing the study location of papers included in the review. The colour scale of the continents ranging from 0 – 0.9 indicates the proportions of amphibian and reptile species represented in the reviewed papers when compared to known species in the world (obtained from AmphibiaWeb and ReptileDatabase): a Europe (0.73), Africa (0.23), North America (0.23), South America (0.18), Oceania (0.07) and Asia (0.06) and b Europe (0.27), Oceania (0.18), Africa (0.12), North America (0.11), South America (0.09) and Asia (0.02)
Co-authorship map of countries involved in habitat fragmentation research in a amphibians and b reptiles. The colours represent the continents countries belong to. Each circle represents an author’s country and the size represents the collaboration frequency with other countries. The lines between the nodes represent the collaboration networks between the countries while the thickness of the lines indicates the collaboration intensities between them. Category co-occurrence network maps for c amphibians and d reptiles. The colour represents the different cluster groups each category belongs to. Abbreviations for the categories in forms of habitat change: fragmentation (FGM), agriculture (AGR), Logging (LOG), Mining (MIN), Urbanisation (URB), road (RD), other habitat fragmentation (OHC); sampling methods: genetics (GEN), direct tracking method (DTM), aerial photographs (APT), GIS/ Satellite images (GIS), experimental (EXP), prediction/ simulation models (PSM) and response variables: species richness/ diversity (SPR), functional richness/ species guild (FCR), presence/ absence (PAS), population (POP), abundance (ABD), dispersal (DSP), breeding sites (BRD), fitness measure (FIT), interspecific interaction (INT), extinction/ colonisation rate (ECR), microhabitat preference (MHP), comparison between generalist and specialist (CGS), other response variables (ORV) (see also Online Appendix 1). Maps are created in VOSviewer
Species coverage for each taxonomic family in selected papers of amphibians. The numbers on each row indicate the total number of species known in its respective family (obtained from AmphibiaWeb 2021)
Species coverage for each taxonomic family in selected papers of reptiles. The numbers on each row indicate the total number of species known in its respective family (obtained from ReptileDatabase)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please reload

Please Wait

GET IN TOUCH

Address:

Museum Koenig

Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB)

Adenauerallee 127

53113 Bonn

Germany

d.roedder@leibniz-lib.de

Follow Me

Research Gate

Google Scholar